First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 1  Votes  2355 49/84 (14.3%) Max Turkel, Alice L.     2862    (17.4%)  1 Fantini, Alfred B.     2855    (17.3%)  1 Grassi, Joseph G.     2135    (12.9%)  1 Price, Alan C.     1873    (11.4%)  1 Harding, Richard, Jr.     1689    (10.2%)  1 Walser, Nancy     1677    (10.2%)  1 Segat, Susana M.     1590    (9.6%)  1 Erlien, Marla L.     1193    (7.2%)  1 Baker, Fred     324    (2.0%)  1 Delaney, Vincent J.     240    (1.5%)  1 Write-in     51    (0.3%)  1           Results       Fantini, Alfred B. Elected     Turkel, Alice L. Elected               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Fantini, Alfred B. 499 35/84 67/84 1: 2354   Turkel, Alice L. 506 35/84 67/84 1: 2484

Each ballot initially counts toward its highest-ranked eligible choice. However, in future rounds, a maximum fraction of a ballot may be imposed on a candidate. This allows voters for popular winners (or for eliminated losers) to help unelected candidates or candidates elected later. If there are no such candidates, the leftover fraction goes back to the first winner, or count toward "none of these" if there are no ranked winners.

The ballot fraction precision is equal to 1/Seats(Seats+1), which ensures that winners can always be kept between Enough votes to win, more than (Total Votes for Candidates)/(Seats+1), and the Ideal Number of votes, (Total Votes for Candidates)/Seats.
If all winners have at least "Enough" votes, it is impossible to elect too many candidates. This number is Ballots/(Seats+1) plus the smallest fraction.
If all winners have exactly the Ideal Number of votes, and they each have an equal voice, everyone who voted for a winner is equally represented.
The dotted line on the graph represents Enough votes.
The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 2  Votes  2355 49/84 (14.3%) Max Turkel, Alice L.     2397 79/84  (14.5%)  67/84 Fantini, Alfred B.     2409 47/84  (14.6%)  67/84 Grassi, Joseph G.     2452 45/84  (14.9%)  1 Price, Alan C.     1921 82/84  (11.7%)  1 Harding, Richard, Jr.     1743 20/84  (10.6%)  1 Walser, Nancy     1870 23/84  (11.3%)  1 Segat, Susana M.     1786 60/84  (10.8%)  1 Erlien, Marla L.     1240 30/84  (7.5%)  1 Baker, Fred     354 13/84  (2.1%)  1 Delaney, Vincent J.     260 3/84  (1.6%)  1 Write-in     52 18/84  (0.3%)  1           Results       Fantini, Alfred B. Equalized     Grassi, Joseph G. Elected     Turkel, Alice L. Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Fantini, Alfred B. 53 82/84 61/84 67/84: 2354 17/84: 133   Grassi, Joseph G. 96 80/84 75/84 1: 1728 17/84: 1039   Turkel, Alice L. 42 30/84 65/84 67/84: 2484 17/84: 158

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 3  Votes  2355 49/84 (14.3%) Max Turkel, Alice L.     2364 37/84  (14.3%)  65/84 Fantini, Alfred B.     2366 47/84  (14.4%)  61/84 Grassi, Joseph G.     2373 75/84  (14.4%)  75/84 Price, Alan C.     1934 55/84  (11.7%)  1 Harding, Richard, Jr.     1770 34/84  (10.7%)  1 Walser, Nancy     1904 9/84  (11.5%)  1 Segat, Susana M.     1831 56/84  (11.1%)  1 Erlien, Marla L.     1251 45/84  (7.6%)  1 Baker, Fred     368 54/84  (2.2%)  1 Delaney, Vincent J.     270 14/84  (1.6%)  1 Write-in     52 78/84  (0.3%)  1           Results       Write-in Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 4  Votes  2351 1/84 (14.3%) Max Turkel, Alice L.     2368 12/84  (14.4%)  65/84 Fantini, Alfred B.     2368 5/84  (14.4%)  61/84 Grassi, Joseph G.     2374 56/84  (14.4%)  75/84 Price, Alan C.     1936 55/84  (11.8%)  1 Harding, Richard, Jr.     1774 34/84  (10.8%)  1 Walser, Nancy     1904 32/84  (11.6%)  1 Segat, Susana M.     1834 75/84  (11.1%)  1 Erlien, Marla L.     1252 83/84  (7.6%)  1 Baker, Fred     370 54/84  (2.3%)  1 Delaney, Vincent J.     272 14/84  (1.7%)  1 None of these     32                Results       Grassi, Joseph G. Equalized     Fantini, Alfred B. Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Grassi, Joseph G. 23 55/84 74/84 75/84: 1725 23/84: 941 19/84: 98   Fantini, Alfred B. 17 4/84 60/84 61/84: 2353 19/84: 134 10/84: 696

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 5  Votes  2351 1/84 (14.3%) Max Turkel, Alice L.     2371 65/84  (14.4%)  65/84 Fantini, Alfred B.     2353 46/84  (14.3%)  60/84 Grassi, Joseph G.     2371 35/84  (14.4%)  74/84 Price, Alan C.     1937 60/84  (11.8%)  1 Harding, Richard, Jr.     1777 51/84  (10.8%)  1 Walser, Nancy     1906 28/84  (11.6%)  1 Segat, Susana M.     1838 62/84  (11.2%)  1 Erlien, Marla L.     1253 73/84  (7.6%)  1 Baker, Fred     372 52/84  (2.3%)  1 Delaney, Vincent J.     273 32/84  (1.7%)  1 None of these     32                Results       Delaney, Vincent J. Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 6  Votes  2344 37/84 (14.3%) Max Turkel, Alice L.     2383 55/84  (14.5%)  65/84 Fantini, Alfred B.     2386 16/84  (14.5%)  60/84 Grassi, Joseph G.     2407 61/84  (14.7%)  74/84 Price, Alan C.     1958 21/84  (11.9%)  1 Harding, Richard, Jr.     1809 68/84  (11.0%)  1 Walser, Nancy     1922 2/84  (11.7%)  1 Segat, Susana M.     1850 69/84  (11.3%)  1 Erlien, Marla L.     1285 70/84  (7.8%)  1 Baker, Fred     406 58/84  (2.5%)  1 None of these     78                Results       Fantini, Alfred B. Equalized     Grassi, Joseph G. Equalized     Turkel, Alice L. Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Fantini, Alfred B. 41 63/84 57/84 60/84: 2371 19/84: 139 10/84: 676   Grassi, Joseph G. 63 24/84 69/84 74/84: 1735 24/84: 928 19/84: 99   Turkel, Alice L. 39 18/84 64/84 65/84: 2483 24/84: 155 10/84: 93

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 7  Votes  2344 37/84 (14.3%) Max Turkel, Alice L.     2368 20/84  (14.4%)  64/84 Fantini, Alfred B.     2372 36/84  (14.5%)  57/84 Grassi, Joseph G.     2358 79/84  (14.4%)  69/84 Price, Alan C.     1965 33/84  (12.0%)  1 Harding, Richard, Jr.     1824 75/84  (11.1%)  1 Walser, Nancy     1939 61/84  (11.8%)  1 Segat, Susana M.     1874 53/84  (11.4%)  1 Erlien, Marla L.     1292 9/84  (7.9%)  1 Baker, Fred     414 54/84  (2.5%)  1 None of these     78                Results       Baker, Fred Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 8  Votes  2335 61/84 (14.3%) Max Turkel, Alice L.     2384 32/84  (14.6%)  64/84 Fantini, Alfred B.     2480 38/84  (15.2%)  57/84 Grassi, Joseph G.     2429 37/84  (14.9%)  69/84 Price, Alan C.     2001 3/84  (12.2%)  1 Harding, Richard, Jr.     1866 20/84  (11.4%)  1 Walser, Nancy     1962 19/84  (12.0%)  1 Segat, Susana M.     1895 18/84  (11.6%)  1 Erlien, Marla L.     1331 1/84  (8.1%)  1 None of these     139                Results       Fantini, Alfred B. Equalized     Grassi, Joseph G. Equalized     Turkel, Alice L. Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Fantini, Alfred B. 144 61/84 45/84 57/84: 2405 20/84: 139 15/84: 631   Grassi, Joseph G. 93 60/84 54/84 69/84: 1749 27/84: 887 20/84: 97   Turkel, Alice L. 48 55/84 61/84 64/84: 2480 27/84: 160 15/84: 93

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 9  Votes  2335 61/84 (14.3%) Max Turkel, Alice L.     2347 59/84  (14.4%)  61/84 Fantini, Alfred B.     2354 65/84  (14.4%)  45/84 Grassi, Joseph G.     2347 52/84  (14.4%)  54/84 Price, Alan C.     2027 6/84  (12.4%)  1 Harding, Richard, Jr.     1920 59/84  (11.7%)  1 Walser, Nancy     2020 79/84  (12.4%)  1 Segat, Susana M.     1977 78/84  (12.1%)  1 Erlien, Marla L.     1353 22/84  (8.3%)  1 None of these     139                Results       Erlien, Marla L. Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 10  Votes  2322 49/84 (14.3%) Max Turkel, Alice L.     2598 71/84  (16.0%)  61/84 Fantini, Alfred B.     2398 27/84  (14.8%)  45/84 Grassi, Joseph G.     2392 75/84  (14.7%)  54/84 Price, Alan C.     2260 61/84  (13.9%)  1 Harding, Richard, Jr.     2214 59/84  (13.6%)  1 Walser, Nancy     2188 23/84  (13.5%)  1 Segat, Susana M.     2204 20/84  (13.6%)  1 None of these     231                Results       Fantini, Alfred B. Equalized     Grassi, Joseph G. Equalized     Turkel, Alice L. Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Fantini, Alfred B. 75 62/84 40/84 45/84: 2424 30/84: 631 23/84: 142   Grassi, Joseph G. 70 26/84 47/84 54/84: 1754 39/84: 894 23/84: 102   Turkel, Alice L. 276 22/84 52/84 61/84: 2732 39/84: 164 30/84: 95

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 11  Votes  2322 49/84 (14.3%) Max Turkel, Alice L.     2330 4/84  (14.3%)  52/84 Fantini, Alfred B.     2373 14/84  (14.6%)  40/84 Grassi, Joseph G.     2358 14/84  (14.5%)  47/84 Price, Alan C.     2297 64/84  (14.1%)  1 Harding, Richard, Jr.     2258 58/84  (13.9%)  1 Walser, Nancy     2308 70/84  (14.2%)  1 Segat, Susana M.     2331 28/84  (14.3%)  1 None of these     231                Results       Segat, Susana M. Elected     Fantini, Alfred B. Equalized     Grassi, Joseph G. Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Segat, Susana M. 8 63/84 83/84 1: 1573 44/84: 185 37/84: 107 32/84: 802   Fantini, Alfred B. 50 49/84 38/84 40/84: 2424 37/84: 631 32/84: 142   Grassi, Joseph G. 35 49/84 45/84 47/84: 1754 44/84: 894 32/84: 102

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 12  Votes  2322 49/84 (14.3%) Max Turkel, Alice L.     2350 79/84  (14.5%)  52/84 Fantini, Alfred B.     2338 18/84  (14.4%)  38/84 Grassi, Joseph G.     2345 14/84  (14.4%)  45/84 Price, Alan C.     2304 11/84  (14.2%)  1 Harding, Richard, Jr.     2272 58/84  (14.0%)  1 Walser, Nancy     2319 73/84  (14.3%)  1 Segat, Susana M.     2326 83/84  (14.3%)  83/84 None of these     231                Results       Harding, Richard, Jr. Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 13  Votes  2252 1/84 (14.3%) Max Turkel, Alice L.     2643 19/84  (16.8%)  52/84 Fantini, Alfred B.     2550 7/84  (16.2%)  38/84 Grassi, Joseph G.     2621 17/84  (16.6%)  45/84 Price, Alan C.     2866 65/84  (18.2%)  1 Walser, Nancy     2486 11/84  (15.8%)  1 Segat, Susana M.     2596 49/84  (16.5%)  83/84 None of these     725                Results       Price, Alan C. Elected     Walser, Nancy Elected               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Price, Alan C. 239 37/84 1 1: 2130 46/84: 59 39/84: 81 32/84: 263 1/84: 267

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

There is a newly elected candidate whose maximum could not be reduced. The surplus is lower than the number of ballots in the first histogram bin (the ballots counting the largest fraction toward the candidate) times the smallest fraction, so they cannot all transfer that fraction without exceeding the surplus.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 14  Votes  2627 28/84 (16.7%) Max Turkel, Alice L.     2643 19/84  (16.8%)  52/84 Fantini, Alfred B.     2550 7/84  (16.2%)  38/84 Grassi, Joseph G.     2621 17/84  (16.6%)  45/84 Price, Alan C.     2866 65/84  (18.2%)  1 Walser, Nancy     2486 11/84  (15.8%)  1 Segat, Susana M.     2596 49/84  (16.5%)  83/84 None of these     725                Results       Price, Alan C. Equalized     Segat, Susana M. Equalized     Turkel, Alice L. Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Price, Alan C. 239 37/84 74/84 1: 2130 46/84: 59 39/84: 81 32/84: 263 1/84: 267   Segat, Susana M.     80/84 83/84: 1711 46/84: 203 39/84: 137 32/84: 872 9/84: 534 1/84: 373   Turkel, Alice L. 15 75/84 49/84 52/84: 2927 46/84: 190 39/84: 126 9/84: 559 1/84: 984

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Only winners remain, so the dotted line is raised to the Ideal Number.
Go to the next round

First Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 15  Votes  2627 28/84 (16.7%) Max Turkel, Alice L.     2656 58/84  (16.9%)  49/84 Fantini, Alfred B.     2586 25/84  (16.4%)  38/84 Grassi, Joseph G.     2657 17/84  (16.9%)  45/84 Price, Alan C.     2631 11/84  (16.7%)  74/84 Walser, Nancy     2588 76/84  (16.4%)  1 Segat, Susana M.     2643 65/84  (16.8%)  80/84 None of these     725                Results         Fantini, Alfred B. Elected     Grassi, Joseph G. Elected     Price, Alan C. Elected     Segat, Susana M. Elected     Turkel, Alice L. Elected     Walser, Nancy Elected

No further maximum reductions are allowed, so the count is complete. All winners should be near the Ideal Number of votes. Usually most ballots count toward their highest-ranked winner. Some count for two winners, but rarely more than that. See the slice report. The depth report shows the contribution of lower choices to the result. The "none of these" pile is an accurate measure of unsatisfied voters.

First Round | Final Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Rank	Fraction of votes for winners
1st	61.8%
2nd	28.8%
3rd	7.3%
4th	1.5%
5th	0.4%

First Round | Final Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Slices	Percentage of ballots with that many slices
1	28.9%
2	62.0%
3	9.1%