First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 1  Votes  2008 1/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     2994    (14.9%)  1 Davis, Henrietta     1846    (9.2%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1656    (8.2%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1613    (8.0%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1525    (7.6%)  1 Decker, Marjorie C.     1378    (6.9%)  1 Murphy, Brian     1362    (6.8%)  1 DeBergalis, Matt S.     1206    (6.0%)  1 Maher, David P.     1190    (5.9%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1181    (5.9%)  1 Pitkin, John     1010    (5.0%)  1 Kelley, Craig A.     992    (4.9%)  1 Bellew, Carole K.     735    (3.7%)  1 Smith, Aimee Louise     480    (2.4%)  1 King, Ethridge A., Jr.     361    (1.8%)  1 Taymorberry, Laurie     188    (0.9%)  1 LaTremouille, Robert J.     126    (0.6%)  1 Hall, Robert L., Sr.     96    (0.5%)  1 Dixon, Vincent Lawrence     64    (0.3%)  1 Greenwood, Dan J.     39    (0.2%)  1 Write-in 1     36    (0.2%)  1 Write-in 2     2    (0.0%)  1           Results       Galluccio, Anthony D. Elected               Transfers (to these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Galluccio, Anthony D. 985 89/90 58/90 1: 2757

Each ballot initially counts toward its highest-ranked eligible choice. However, in future rounds, a maximum fraction of a ballot may be imposed on a candidate. This allows voters for popular winners (or for eliminated losers) to help unelected candidates or candidates elected later. If there are no such candidates, the leftover fraction goes back to the first winner, or count toward "none of these" if there are no ranked winners.

The ballot fraction precision is equal to 1/Seats(Seats+1), which ensures that winners can always be kept between Enough votes to win, more than (Total Votes for Candidates)/(Seats+1), and the Ideal Number of votes, (Total Votes for Candidates)/Seats.
If all winners have at least "Enough" votes, it is impossible to elect too many candidates. This number is Ballots/(Seats+1) plus the smallest fraction.
If all winners have exactly the Ideal Number of votes, and they each have an equal voice, everyone who voted for a winner is equally represented.
The dotted line on the graph represents Enough votes.
The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 2  Votes  2008 1/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     2013 66/90  (10.0%)  58/90 Davis, Henrietta     1890 8/90  (9.4%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1898 44/90  (9.5%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1754 14/90  (8.7%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1596 42/90  (8.0%)  1 Decker, Marjorie C.     1431 30/90  (7.1%)  1 Murphy, Brian     1396 44/90  (7.0%)  1 DeBergalis, Matt S.     1219 14/90  (6.1%)  1 Maher, David P.     1426 72/90  (7.1%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1215 12/90  (6.1%)  1 Pitkin, John     1029 18/90  (5.1%)  1 Kelley, Craig A.     1020 40/90  (5.1%)  1 Bellew, Carole K.     754 18/90  (3.8%)  1 Smith, Aimee Louise     483 18/90  (2.4%)  1 King, Ethridge A., Jr.     376 26/90  (1.9%)  1 Taymorberry, Laurie     192 56/90  (1.0%)  1 LaTremouille, Robert J.     130 88/90  (0.7%)  1 Hall, Robert L., Sr.     103 10/90  (0.5%)  1 Dixon, Vincent Lawrence     65 70/90  (0.3%)  1 Greenwood, Dan J.     43 24/90  (0.2%)  1 Write-in 1     37 6/90  (0.2%)  1 Write-in 2     2    (0.0%)  1           Results       Write-in 2 Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 3  Votes  2007 82/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     2013 66/90  (10.0%)  58/90 Davis, Henrietta     1890 8/90  (9.4%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1898 44/90  (9.5%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1754 14/90  (8.7%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1596 42/90  (8.0%)  1 Decker, Marjorie C.     1431 30/90  (7.1%)  1 Murphy, Brian     1396 44/90  (7.0%)  1 DeBergalis, Matt S.     1219 14/90  (6.1%)  1 Maher, David P.     1426 72/90  (7.1%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1215 12/90  (6.1%)  1 Pitkin, John     1029 18/90  (5.1%)  1 Kelley, Craig A.     1021 40/90  (5.1%)  1 Bellew, Carole K.     754 18/90  (3.8%)  1 Smith, Aimee Louise     483 18/90  (2.4%)  1 King, Ethridge A., Jr.     376 26/90  (1.9%)  1 Taymorberry, Laurie     192 56/90  (1.0%)  1 LaTremouille, Robert J.     130 88/90  (0.7%)  1 Hall, Robert L., Sr.     103 10/90  (0.5%)  1 Dixon, Vincent Lawrence     65 70/90  (0.3%)  1 Greenwood, Dan J.     43 24/90  (0.2%)  1 Write-in 1     37 6/90  (0.2%)  1 None of these     1                Results       Write-in 1 Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 4  Votes  2006 28/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     2016 40/90  (10.1%)  58/90 Davis, Henrietta     1893 8/90  (9.4%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1899 76/90  (9.5%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1754 14/90  (8.7%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1600 42/90  (8.0%)  1 Decker, Marjorie C.     1433 30/90  (7.1%)  1 Murphy, Brian     1396 44/90  (7.0%)  1 DeBergalis, Matt S.     1219 14/90  (6.1%)  1 Maher, David P.     1426 72/90  (7.1%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1216 12/90  (6.1%)  1 Pitkin, John     1030 18/90  (5.1%)  1 Kelley, Craig A.     1022 40/90  (5.1%)  1 Bellew, Carole K.     755 18/90  (3.8%)  1 Smith, Aimee Louise     484 18/90  (2.4%)  1 King, Ethridge A., Jr.     378 26/90  (1.9%)  1 Taymorberry, Laurie     192 56/90  (1.0%)  1 LaTremouille, Robert J.     130 88/90  (0.7%)  1 Hall, Robert L., Sr.     103 10/90  (0.5%)  1 Dixon, Vincent Lawrence     66 70/90  (0.3%)  1 Greenwood, Dan J.     43 24/90  (0.2%)  1 None of these     17                Results       Greenwood, Dan J. Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 5  Votes  2006 1/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     2017 8/90  (10.1%)  58/90 Davis, Henrietta     1895 8/90  (9.4%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1900 18/90  (9.5%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1754 14/90  (8.7%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1602 16/90  (8.0%)  1 Decker, Marjorie C.     1435 4/90  (7.2%)  1 Murphy, Brian     1398 44/90  (7.0%)  1 DeBergalis, Matt S.     1223 14/90  (6.1%)  1 Maher, David P.     1430 14/90  (7.1%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1216 12/90  (6.1%)  1 Pitkin, John     1031 18/90  (5.1%)  1 Kelley, Craig A.     1023 40/90  (5.1%)  1 Bellew, Carole K.     756 18/90  (3.8%)  1 Smith, Aimee Louise     488 18/90  (2.4%)  1 King, Ethridge A., Jr.     381 58/90  (1.9%)  1 Taymorberry, Laurie     192 56/90  (1.0%)  1 LaTremouille, Robert J.     132 30/90  (0.7%)  1 Hall, Robert L., Sr.     115 48/90  (0.6%)  1 Dixon, Vincent Lawrence     67 12/90  (0.3%)  1 None of these     20                Results       Dixon, Vincent Lawrence Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 6  Votes  2005 82/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     2024 28/90  (10.1%)  58/90 Davis, Henrietta     1898 8/90  (9.5%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1905 18/90  (9.5%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1755 46/90  (8.8%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1605 48/90  (8.0%)  1 Decker, Marjorie C.     1439 36/90  (7.2%)  1 Murphy, Brian     1401 44/90  (7.0%)  1 DeBergalis, Matt S.     1229 46/90  (6.1%)  1 Maher, David P.     1431 78/90  (7.1%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1222 12/90  (6.1%)  1 Pitkin, John     1034 18/90  (5.2%)  1 Kelley, Craig A.     1027 72/90  (5.1%)  1 Bellew, Carole K.     757 18/90  (3.8%)  1 Smith, Aimee Louise     489 18/90  (2.4%)  1 King, Ethridge A., Jr.     385    (1.9%)  1 Taymorberry, Laurie     193 56/90  (1.0%)  1 LaTremouille, Robert J.     135 30/90  (0.7%)  1 Hall, Robert L., Sr.     123 54/90  (0.6%)  1 None of these     21                Results       Hall, Robert L., Sr. Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 7  Votes  2004 28/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     2033 48/90  (10.1%)  58/90 Davis, Henrietta     1903 8/90  (9.5%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1909 30/90  (9.5%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1757 20/90  (8.8%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1611 22/90  (8.0%)  1 Decker, Marjorie C.     1443 10/90  (7.2%)  1 Murphy, Brian     1403 44/90  (7.0%)  1 DeBergalis, Matt S.     1231 46/90  (6.1%)  1 Maher, David P.     1440 52/90  (7.2%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1231 76/90  (6.1%)  1 Pitkin, John     1040 50/90  (5.2%)  1 Kelley, Craig A.     1056 6/90  (5.3%)  1 Bellew, Carole K.     762 18/90  (3.8%)  1 Smith, Aimee Louise     490 18/90  (2.4%)  1 King, Ethridge A., Jr.     391 6/90  (2.0%)  1 Taymorberry, Laurie     196 56/90  (1.0%)  1 LaTremouille, Robert J.     141 30/90  (0.7%)  1 None of these     37                Results       LaTremouille, Robert J. Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 8  Votes  2002 64/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     2037 48/90  (10.2%)  58/90 Davis, Henrietta     1914 8/90  (9.6%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1913 36/90  (9.6%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1764 58/90  (8.8%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1622 54/90  (8.1%)  1 Decker, Marjorie C.     1448 10/90  (7.2%)  1 Murphy, Brian     1410 76/90  (7.0%)  1 DeBergalis, Matt S.     1235 46/90  (6.2%)  1 Maher, David P.     1443 58/90  (7.2%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1241 18/90  (6.2%)  1 Pitkin, John     1053 82/90  (5.3%)  1 Kelley, Craig A.     1067 6/90  (5.3%)  1 Bellew, Carole K.     766 18/90  (3.8%)  1 Smith, Aimee Louise     498 18/90  (2.5%)  1 King, Ethridge A., Jr.     402 38/90  (2.0%)  1 Taymorberry, Laurie     207 56/90  (1.0%)  1 None of these     53                Results       Galluccio, Anthony D. Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Galluccio, Anthony D. 34 74/90 57/90 58/90: 2766

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 9  Votes  2002 64/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     2006 72/90  (10.0%)  57/90 Davis, Henrietta     1915 42/90  (9.6%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1921 9/90  (9.6%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1769 12/90  (8.8%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1624 81/90  (8.1%)  1 Decker, Marjorie C.     1449 75/90  (7.2%)  1 Murphy, Brian     1411 84/90  (7.1%)  1 DeBergalis, Matt S.     1235 84/90  (6.2%)  1 Maher, David P.     1451 12/90  (7.2%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1242 27/90  (6.2%)  1 Pitkin, John     1054 48/90  (5.3%)  1 Kelley, Craig A.     1068 9/90  (5.3%)  1 Bellew, Carole K.     766 72/90  (3.8%)  1 Smith, Aimee Louise     498 27/90  (2.5%)  1 King, Ethridge A., Jr.     402 87/90  (2.0%)  1 Taymorberry, Laurie     207 69/90  (1.0%)  1 None of these     53                Results       Taymorberry, Laurie Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 10  Votes  1999 82/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     2010 72/90  (10.1%)  57/90 Davis, Henrietta     1944 18/90  (9.7%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1928 18/90  (9.6%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1780 21/90  (8.9%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1631 24/90  (8.2%)  1 Decker, Marjorie C.     1470 75/90  (7.4%)  1 Murphy, Brian     1424 84/90  (7.1%)  1 DeBergalis, Matt S.     1244 84/90  (6.2%)  1 Maher, David P.     1456 21/90  (7.3%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1257 60/90  (6.3%)  1 Pitkin, John     1063 48/90  (5.3%)  1 Kelley, Craig A.     1076 9/90  (5.4%)  1 Bellew, Carole K.     783 72/90  (3.9%)  1 Smith, Aimee Louise     516 27/90  (2.6%)  1 King, Ethridge A., Jr.     409 87/90  (2.0%)  1 None of these     81                Results       King, Ethridge A., Jr. Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 11  Votes  1994 46/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     2047 69/90  (10.3%)  57/90 Davis, Henrietta     1970 27/90  (9.9%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1956 87/90  (9.8%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1792 57/90  (9.0%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1663 60/90  (8.3%)  1 Decker, Marjorie C.     1490 60/90  (7.5%)  1 Murphy, Brian     1445 69/90  (7.2%)  1 DeBergalis, Matt S.     1285 3/90  (6.4%)  1 Maher, David P.     1492 12/90  (7.5%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1283 3/90  (6.4%)  1 Pitkin, John     1087 24/90  (5.5%)  1 Kelley, Craig A.     1098 75/90  (5.5%)  1 Bellew, Carole K.     805 24/90  (4.0%)  1 Smith, Aimee Louise     525 60/90  (2.6%)  1 None of these     135                Results       Galluccio, Anthony D. Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Galluccio, Anthony D. 53 23/90 56/90 57/90: 2807

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 12  Votes  1994 46/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     2016 52/90  (10.1%)  56/90 Davis, Henrietta     1971 66/90  (9.9%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1964 76/90  (9.9%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1797 26/90  (9.0%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1666 10/90  (8.4%)  1 Decker, Marjorie C.     1492 40/90  (7.5%)  1 Murphy, Brian     1446 82/90  (7.3%)  1 DeBergalis, Matt S.     1285 44/90  (6.4%)  1 Maher, David P.     1499 86/90  (7.5%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1284 14/90  (6.4%)  1 Pitkin, John     1087 82/90  (5.5%)  1 Kelley, Craig A.     1099 80/90  (5.5%)  1 Bellew, Carole K.     805 82/90  (4.0%)  1 Smith, Aimee Louise     525 70/90  (2.6%)  1 None of these     135                Results       Smith, Aimee Louise Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 13  Votes  1988 64/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     2025 6/90  (10.2%)  56/90 Davis, Henrietta     2014 10/90  (10.1%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1986 54/90  (10.0%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1811 60/90  (9.1%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1694 44/90  (8.5%)  1 Decker, Marjorie C.     1532 40/90  (7.7%)  1 Murphy, Brian     1478 82/90  (7.4%)  1 DeBergalis, Matt S.     1344 78/90  (6.8%)  1 Maher, David P.     1504 30/90  (7.6%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1389 82/90  (7.0%)  1 Pitkin, John     1125 26/90  (5.7%)  1 Kelley, Craig A.     1124 24/90  (5.7%)  1 Bellew, Carole K.     855 4/90  (4.3%)  1 None of these     193                Results       Davis, Henrietta Elected     Galluccio, Anthony D. Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Davis, Henrietta 25 36/90 89/90 1: 1853 34/90: 118   Galluccio, Anthony D. 36 32/90 55/90 56/90: 2811

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 14  Votes  1988 64/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     1995 53/90  (10.0%)  55/90 Davis, Henrietta     1994 87/90  (10.0%)  89/90 Sullivan, Michael A.     1995 7/90  (10.0%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1816 64/90  (9.1%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1698 18/90  (8.5%)  1 Decker, Marjorie C.     1539 18/90  (7.7%)  1 Murphy, Brian     1483 44/90  (7.5%)  1 DeBergalis, Matt S.     1346 18/90  (6.8%)  1 Maher, David P.     1512 87/90  (7.6%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1393 56/90  (7.0%)  1 Pitkin, John     1127 33/90  (5.7%)  1 Kelley, Craig A.     1125 84/90  (5.7%)  1 Bellew, Carole K.     857 61/90  (4.3%)  1 None of these     193                Results       Sullivan, Michael A. Elected               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Sullivan, Michael A. 6 33/90 1 1: 1564 35/90: 625 1/90: 43

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

There is a newly elected candidate whose maximum could not be reduced. The surplus is lower than the number of ballots in the first histogram bin (the ballots counting the largest fraction toward the candidate) times the smallest fraction, so they cannot all transfer that fraction without exceeding the surplus.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 15  Votes  1988 64/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     1995 53/90  (10.0%)  55/90 Davis, Henrietta     1994 87/90  (10.0%)  89/90 Sullivan, Michael A.     1995 7/90  (10.0%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1816 64/90  (9.1%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1698 18/90  (8.5%)  1 Decker, Marjorie C.     1539 18/90  (7.7%)  1 Murphy, Brian     1483 44/90  (7.5%)  1 DeBergalis, Matt S.     1346 18/90  (6.8%)  1 Maher, David P.     1512 87/90  (7.6%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1393 56/90  (7.0%)  1 Pitkin, John     1127 33/90  (5.7%)  1 Kelley, Craig A.     1125 84/90  (5.7%)  1 Bellew, Carole K.     857 61/90  (4.3%)  1 None of these     193                Results       Bellew, Carole K. Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 16  Votes  1981 10/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     2048 14/90  (10.3%)  55/90 Davis, Henrietta     2169 84/90  (11.0%)  89/90 Sullivan, Michael A.     2031 66/90  (10.3%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1857 30/90  (9.4%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1726 55/90  (8.7%)  1 Decker, Marjorie C.     1610 52/90  (8.1%)  1 Murphy, Brian     1561 52/90  (7.9%)  1 DeBergalis, Matt S.     1418 55/90  (7.2%)  1 Maher, David P.     1548 83/90  (7.8%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1450 1/90  (7.3%)  1 Pitkin, John     1206 64/90  (6.1%)  1 Kelley, Craig A.     1180 74/90  (6.0%)  1 None of these     269                Results       Davis, Henrietta Equalized     Galluccio, Anthony D. Equalized     Sullivan, Michael A. Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Davis, Henrietta 188 74/90 81/90 89/90: 2006 35/90: 126   Galluccio, Anthony D. 67 4/90 52/90 55/90: 2872 1/90: 164   Sullivan, Michael A. 50 56/90 86/90 1: 1582 35/90: 637 1/90: 45