First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 1  Votes  1712 46/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     3230    (18.9%)  1 Murphy, Brian     1716    (10.0%)  1 Davis, Henrietta     1713    (10.0%)  1 Decker, Marjorie C.     1540    (9.0%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1402    (8.2%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1339    (7.8%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1316    (7.7%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1141    (6.7%)  1 Pitkin, John     1091    (6.4%)  1 Maher, David P.     1017    (5.9%)  1 King, Ethridge A.     378    (2.2%)  1 Iskovitz, Steve     345    (2.0%)  1 Jens, Steven E.     278    (1.6%)  1 Horowitz, Jacob     155    (0.9%)  1 Hall, Robert L.     153    (0.9%)  1 Dixon, Vincent Lawrence     92    (0.5%)  1 Peixoto, Helder     69    (0.4%)  1 Condit, James E., III     63    (0.4%)  1 Williamson, James M.     58    (0.3%)  1 Write-in     29    (0.2%)  1           Results       Davis, Henrietta Elected     Murphy, Brian Elected     Galluccio, Anthony D. Elected               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Davis, Henrietta   44/90 86/90 1: 1645   Murphy, Brian 3 44/90 87/90 1: 1627   Galluccio, Anthony D. 1517 44/90 44/90 1: 2947

Each ballot initially counts toward its highest-ranked eligible choice. However, in future rounds, a maximum fraction of a ballot may be imposed on a candidate. This allows voters for popular winners (or for eliminated losers) to help unelected candidates or candidates elected later. If there are no such candidates, the leftover fraction goes back to the first winner, or count toward "none of these" if there are no ranked winners.

The ballot fraction precision is equal to 1/Seats(Seats+1), which ensures that winners can always be kept between Enough votes to win, more than (Total Votes for Candidates)/(Seats+1), and the Ideal Number of votes, (Total Votes for Candidates)/Seats.
If all winners have at least "Enough" votes, it is impossible to elect too many candidates. This number is Ballots/(Seats+1) plus the smallest fraction.
If all winners have exactly the Ideal Number of votes, and they each have an equal voice, everyone who voted for a winner is equally represented.
The dotted line on the graph represents Enough votes.
The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 2  Votes  1712 46/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     1733 54/90  (10.1%)  44/90 Murphy, Brian     1725 31/90  (10.1%)  87/90 Davis, Henrietta     1727 57/90  (10.1%)  86/90 Decker, Marjorie C.     1677    (9.8%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1581 28/90  (9.2%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1429 43/90  (8.3%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1677 65/90  (9.8%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1286 64/90  (7.5%)  1 Pitkin, John     1144 31/90  (6.7%)  1 Maher, David P.     1376 46/90  (8.0%)  1 King, Ethridge A.     421 84/90  (2.5%)  1 Iskovitz, Steve     355 46/90  (2.1%)  1 Jens, Steven E.     292 24/90  (1.7%)  1 Horowitz, Jacob     170 60/90  (1.0%)  1 Hall, Robert L.     179 66/90  (1.0%)  1 Dixon, Vincent Lawrence     101 18/90  (0.6%)  1 Peixoto, Helder     84 88/90  (0.5%)  1 Condit, James E., III     67 60/90  (0.4%)  1 Williamson, James M.     62 31/90  (0.4%)  1 Write-in     29 4/90  (0.2%)  1           Results       Write-in Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 3  Votes  1711 28/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     1736 8/90  (10.1%)  44/90 Murphy, Brian     1726 28/90  (10.1%)  87/90 Davis, Henrietta     1729 53/90  (10.1%)  86/90 Decker, Marjorie C.     1679 2/90  (9.8%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1581 74/90  (9.2%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1429 43/90  (8.4%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1677 68/90  (9.8%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1288 70/90  (7.5%)  1 Pitkin, John     1145 31/90  (6.7%)  1 Maher, David P.     1376 46/90  (8.0%)  1 King, Ethridge A.     421 84/90  (2.5%)  1 Iskovitz, Steve     358 46/90  (2.1%)  1 Jens, Steven E.     293 24/90  (1.7%)  1 Horowitz, Jacob     171 60/90  (1.0%)  1 Hall, Robert L.     179 66/90  (1.1%)  1 Dixon, Vincent Lawrence     102 18/90  (0.6%)  1 Peixoto, Helder     84 88/90  (0.5%)  1 Condit, James E., III     67 60/90  (0.4%)  1 Williamson, James M.     62 31/90  (0.4%)  1 None of these     12                Results       Williamson, James M. Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 4  Votes  1711 1/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     1738 54/90  (10.2%)  44/90 Murphy, Brian     1729 28/90  (10.1%)  87/90 Davis, Henrietta     1731 49/90  (10.1%)  86/90 Decker, Marjorie C.     1685 8/90  (9.8%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1583 74/90  (9.3%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1434 12/90  (8.4%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1680 72/90  (9.8%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1291 73/90  (7.6%)  1 Pitkin, John     1151 31/90  (6.7%)  1 Maher, David P.     1377 48/90  (8.1%)  1 King, Ethridge A.     423 84/90  (2.5%)  1 Iskovitz, Steve     367 46/90  (2.1%)  1 Jens, Steven E.     294 24/90  (1.7%)  1 Horowitz, Jacob     174 60/90  (1.0%)  1 Hall, Robert L.     181 22/90  (1.1%)  1 Dixon, Vincent Lawrence     104 64/90  (0.6%)  1 Peixoto, Helder     85 88/90  (0.5%)  1 Condit, James E., III     73 63/90  (0.4%)  1 None of these     15                Results       Davis, Henrietta Equalized     Murphy, Brian Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Davis, Henrietta 20 48/90 85/90 86/90: 1647 46/90: 137 3/90: 343   Murphy, Brian 18 27/90 86/90 87/90: 1628 46/90: 90 4/90: 254

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 5  Votes  1711 1/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     1741 37/90  (10.2%)  44/90 Murphy, Brian     1714 19/90  (10.0%)  86/90 Davis, Henrietta     1717 25/90  (10.0%)  85/90 Decker, Marjorie C.     1692 34/90  (9.9%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1584 19/90  (9.3%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1438 87/90  (8.4%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1681 74/90  (9.8%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1293 38/90  (7.6%)  1 Pitkin, John     1156 7/90  (6.8%)  1 Maher, David P.     1378 85/90  (8.1%)  1 King, Ethridge A.     426 7/90  (2.5%)  1 Iskovitz, Steve     367 81/90  (2.2%)  1 Jens, Steven E.     294 36/90  (1.7%)  1 Horowitz, Jacob     176 34/90  (1.0%)  1 Hall, Robert L.     181 41/90  (1.1%)  1 Dixon, Vincent Lawrence     104 76/90  (0.6%)  1 Peixoto, Helder     86 30/90  (0.5%)  1 Condit, James E., III     73 80/90  (0.4%)  1 None of these     15                Results       Condit, James E., III Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 6  Votes  1710 28/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     1744 84/90  (10.2%)  44/90 Murphy, Brian     1715 28/90  (10.0%)  86/90 Davis, Henrietta     1722 85/90  (10.1%)  85/90 Decker, Marjorie C.     1697 67/90  (9.9%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1586 24/90  (9.3%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1443 43/90  (8.4%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1683 81/90  (9.8%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1294 3/90  (7.6%)  1 Pitkin, John     1157 15/90  (6.8%)  1 Maher, David P.     1382 85/90  (8.1%)  1 King, Ethridge A.     427 16/90  (2.5%)  1 Iskovitz, Steve     371 81/90  (2.2%)  1 Jens, Steven E.     305 42/90  (1.8%)  1 Horowitz, Jacob     178 43/90  (1.0%)  1 Hall, Robert L.     185 1/90  (1.1%)  1 Dixon, Vincent Lawrence     116 82/90  (0.7%)  1 Peixoto, Helder     89 30/90  (0.5%)  1 None of these     22                Results       Galluccio, Anthony D. Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Galluccio, Anthony D. 34 56/90 43/90 44/90: 2958 5/90: 116 4/90: 104

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 7  Votes  1710 28/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     1712 6/90  (10.0%)  43/90 Murphy, Brian     1716 39/90  (10.0%)  86/90 Davis, Henrietta     1724 53/90  (10.1%)  85/90 Decker, Marjorie C.     1700 20/90  (9.9%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1590 13/90  (9.3%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1445 9/90  (8.4%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1691 68/90  (9.9%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1297 10/90  (7.6%)  1 Pitkin, John     1157 88/90  (6.8%)  1 Maher, David P.     1390 61/90  (8.1%)  1 King, Ethridge A.     427 87/90  (2.5%)  1 Iskovitz, Steve     372 9/90  (2.2%)  1 Jens, Steven E.     305 71/90  (1.8%)  1 Horowitz, Jacob     178 61/90  (1.0%)  1 Hall, Robert L.     185 54/90  (1.1%)  1 Dixon, Vincent Lawrence     117 12/90  (0.7%)  1 Peixoto, Helder     89 59/90  (0.5%)  1 None of these     22                Results       Peixoto, Helder Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 8  Votes  1708 73/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     1721 15/90  (10.1%)  43/90 Murphy, Brian     1719 35/90  (10.1%)  86/90 Davis, Henrietta     1731 9/90  (10.1%)  85/90 Decker, Marjorie C.     1703 41/90  (10.0%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1600 77/90  (9.4%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1447 73/90  (8.5%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1703 37/90  (10.0%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1304 79/90  (7.6%)  1 Pitkin, John     1162 28/90  (6.8%)  1 Maher, David P.     1396 40/90  (8.2%)  1 King, Ethridge A.     428 44/90  (2.5%)  1 Iskovitz, Steve     374 60/90  (2.2%)  1 Jens, Steven E.     307 28/90  (1.8%)  1 Horowitz, Jacob     179 75/90  (1.1%)  1 Hall, Robert L.     186 58/90  (1.1%)  1 Dixon, Vincent Lawrence     120 21/90  (0.7%)  1 None of these     37                Results       Davis, Henrietta Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Davis, Henrietta 22 26/90 84/90 85/90: 1658 47/90: 139 4/90: 348

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 9  Votes  1708 73/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     1722 62/90  (10.1%)  43/90 Murphy, Brian     1722 35/90  (10.1%)  86/90 Davis, Henrietta     1712 61/90  (10.0%)  84/90 Decker, Marjorie C.     1707 69/90  (10.0%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1601 14/90  (9.4%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1450 31/90  (8.5%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1703 74/90  (10.0%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1305 74/90  (7.6%)  1 Pitkin, John     1164 15/90  (6.8%)  1 Maher, David P.     1397 3/90  (8.2%)  1 King, Ethridge A.     429 64/90  (2.5%)  1 Iskovitz, Steve     374 73/90  (2.2%)  1 Jens, Steven E.     307 34/90  (1.8%)  1 Horowitz, Jacob     181 18/90  (1.1%)  1 Hall, Robert L.     186 61/90  (1.1%)  1 Dixon, Vincent Lawrence     120 32/90  (0.7%)  1 None of these     37                Results       Dixon, Vincent Lawrence Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 10  Votes  1707 64/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     1727 60/90  (10.1%)  43/90 Murphy, Brian     1725 76/90  (10.1%)  86/90 Davis, Henrietta     1716 65/90  (10.1%)  84/90 Decker, Marjorie C.     1716 83/90  (10.1%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1605 67/90  (9.4%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1457 39/90  (8.5%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1710 86/90  (10.0%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1312    (7.7%)  1 Pitkin, John     1177 31/90  (6.9%)  1 Maher, David P.     1400 17/90  (8.2%)  1 King, Ethridge A.     435 70/90  (2.6%)  1 Iskovitz, Steve     383 36/90  (2.2%)  1 Jens, Steven E.     321 38/90  (1.9%)  1 Horowitz, Jacob     185 65/90  (1.1%)  1 Hall, Robert L.     199 77/90  (1.2%)  1 None of these     48                Results       Decker, Marjorie C. Elected     Sullivan, Michael A. Elected     Murphy, Brian Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Decker, Marjorie C. 9 19/90 1 1: 1477 47/90: 203 6/90: 364 4/90: 261   Sullivan, Michael A. 3 22/90 1 1: 1213 47/90: 624 6/90: 32 4/90: 47   Murphy, Brian 18 12/90 85/90 86/90: 1631 47/90: 89 6/90: 256

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

There is a newly elected candidate whose maximum could not be reduced. The surplus is lower than the number of ballots in the first histogram bin (the ballots counting the largest fraction toward the candidate) times the smallest fraction, so they cannot all transfer that fraction without exceeding the surplus.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 11  Votes  1707 64/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     1729    (10.1%)  43/90 Murphy, Brian     1707 65/90  (10.0%)  85/90 Davis, Henrietta     1720 73/90  (10.1%)  84/90 Decker, Marjorie C.     1720 3/90  (10.1%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1605 77/90  (9.4%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1459 71/90  (8.5%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1711 54/90  (10.0%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1312 66/90  (7.7%)  1 Pitkin, John     1180 30/90  (6.9%)  1 Maher, David P.     1401 4/90  (8.2%)  1 King, Ethridge A.     436 65/90  (2.6%)  1 Iskovitz, Steve     383 59/90  (2.2%)  1 Jens, Steven E.     321 45/90  (1.9%)  1 Horowitz, Jacob     186 11/90  (1.1%)  1 Hall, Robert L.     200 7/90  (1.2%)  1 None of these     48                Results       Horowitz, Jacob Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 12  Votes  1706 28/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     1734 47/90  (10.2%)  43/90 Murphy, Brian     1722 53/90  (10.1%)  85/90 Davis, Henrietta     1736 43/90  (10.2%)  84/90 Decker, Marjorie C.     1724 82/90  (10.1%)  1 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1608 8/90  (9.4%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1476 67/90  (8.7%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1715 16/90  (10.1%)  1 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1318 12/90  (7.7%)  1 Pitkin, John     1197 53/90  (7.0%)  1 Maher, David P.     1404 47/90  (8.2%)  1 King, Ethridge A.     477 74/90  (2.8%)  1 Iskovitz, Steve     416 60/90  (2.4%)  1 Jens, Steven E.     326 56/90  (1.9%)  1 Hall, Robert L.     203 12/90  (1.2%)  1 None of these     62                Results       Davis, Henrietta Equalized     Decker, Marjorie C. Equalized     Murphy, Brian Equalized     Galluccio, Anthony D. Equalized     Sullivan, Michael A. Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Davis, Henrietta 30 15/90 82/90 84/90: 1672 47/90: 141 5/90: 353   Decker, Marjorie C. 18 54/90 88/90 1: 1481 47/90: 203 6/90: 370 5/90: 263   Murphy, Brian 16 25/90 84/90 85/90: 1644 47/90: 88 7/90: 268 1/90: 218   Galluccio, Anthony D. 28 19/90 42/90 43/90: 2966 7/90: 122 6/90: 109 1/90: 166   Sullivan, Michael A. 8 78/90 89/90 1: 1215 48/90: 624 8/90: 32 6/90: 47 1/90: 66

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 13  Votes  1706 28/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     1714 10/90  (10.0%)  42/90 Murphy, Brian     1717 30/90  (10.1%)  84/90 Davis, Henrietta     1713 20/90  (10.0%)  82/90 Decker, Marjorie C.     1707 19/90  (10.0%)  88/90 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1617 75/90  (9.5%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1491 36/90  (8.7%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1712 67/90  (10.0%)  89/90 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1327 45/90  (7.8%)  1 Pitkin, John     1208 14/90  (7.1%)  1 Maher, David P.     1417 88/90  (8.3%)  1 King, Ethridge A.     485 10/90  (2.8%)  1 Iskovitz, Steve     418 30/90  (2.5%)  1 Jens, Steven E.     327 37/90  (1.9%)  1 Hall, Robert L.     204 59/90  (1.2%)  1 None of these     62                Results       Hall, Robert L. Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 14  Votes  1705 1/90 (10%) Max Galluccio, Anthony D.     1730 30/90  (10.1%)  42/90 Murphy, Brian     1736 1/90  (10.2%)  84/90 Davis, Henrietta     1719 82/90  (10.1%)  82/90 Decker, Marjorie C.     1765 74/90  (10.4%)  88/90 Toomey, Timothy J., Jr.     1619 49/90  (9.5%)  1 Simmons, Denise     1505 55/90  (8.8%)  1 Sullivan, Michael A.     1720 20/90  (10.1%)  89/90 Reeves, Kenneth E.     1339 75/90  (7.9%)  1 Pitkin, John     1215 23/90  (7.1%)  1 Maher, David P.     1429 11/90  (8.4%)  1 King, Ethridge A.     494 38/90  (2.9%)  1 Iskovitz, Steve     440 72/90  (2.6%)  1 Jens, Steven E.     333 10/90  (2.0%)  1 None of these     75                Results       Decker, Marjorie C. Equalized     Murphy, Brian Equalized     Sullivan, Michael A. Equalized     Davis, Henrietta Equalized     Galluccio, Anthony D. Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Decker, Marjorie C. 60 73/90 84/90 88/90: 1529 48/90: 214 8/90: 369 6/90: 266 1/90: 49   Murphy, Brian 31   82/90 84/90: 1656 48/90: 94 8/90: 269 2/90: 222 1/90: 31   Sullivan, Michael A. 15 19/90 87/90 89/90: 1218 48/90: 624 8/90: 32 6/90: 49 2/90: 67   Davis, Henrietta 14 81/90 80/90 82/90: 1676 48/90: 144 7/90: 357 5/90: 311 2/90: 45   Galluccio, Anthony D. 25 29/90 41/90 42/90: 2976 8/90: 124 7/90: 111 5/90: 170 2/90: 320