First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 1  Votes  306 49/84 (14.3%) Max Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.)     273    (12.7%)  1 Spencer Higgins (Student Focus)     237    (11.0%)  1 Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.)     232    (10.8%)  1 Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.)     200    (9.3%)  1 Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus)     178    (8.3%)  1 Avni Patel (L.E.A.D.)     174    (8.1%)  1 Katie Webber (Student Focus)     166    (7.7%)  1 Jenny Yu (L.E.A.D.)     161    (7.5%)  1 Behrad Brad Golshani (Student Focus)     138    (6.4%)  1 Brian McFadden (United Student Focus)     126    (5.9%)  1 Jimmy Moresco (Student Focus)     113    (5.3%)  1 Michael Kongo Aguilera (L.E.A.D.)     74    (3.4%)  1 Joe Harney United (Student Focus)     73    (3.4%)  1 No one     1    (0.0%)  1           Results                 Transfers (to these colors):

Each ballot initially counts toward its highest-ranked eligible choice. However, in future rounds, a maximum fraction of a ballot may be imposed on a candidate. This allows voters for popular winners (or for eliminated losers) to help unelected candidates or candidates elected later. If there are no such candidates, the leftover fraction goes back to the first winner, or count toward "none of these" if there are no ranked winners.

The ballot fraction precision is equal to 1/Seats(Seats+1), which ensures that winners can always be kept between Enough votes to win, more than (Total Votes for Candidates)/(Seats+1), and the Ideal Number of votes, (Total Votes for Candidates)/Seats.
If all winners have at least "Enough" votes, it is impossible to elect too many candidates. This number is Ballots/(Seats+1) plus the smallest fraction.
If all winners have exactly the Ideal Number of votes, and they each have an equal voice, everyone who voted for a winner is equally represented.
The dotted line on the graph represents Enough votes.
No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 2  Votes  306 37/84 (14.3%) Max Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.)     273    (12.7%)  1 Spencer Higgins (Student Focus)     237    (11.0%)  1 Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.)     232    (10.8%)  1 Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.)     200    (9.3%)  1 Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus)     178    (8.3%)  1 Avni Patel (L.E.A.D.)     174    (8.1%)  1 Katie Webber (Student Focus)     166    (7.7%)  1 Jenny Yu (L.E.A.D.)     161    (7.5%)  1 Behrad Brad Golshani (Student Focus)     138    (6.4%)  1 Brian McFadden (United Student Focus)     126    (5.9%)  1 Jimmy Moresco (Student Focus)     113    (5.3%)  1 Michael Kongo Aguilera (L.E.A.D.)     74    (3.4%)  1 Joe Harney United (Student Focus)     73    (3.4%)  1 None of these     1                Results       Joe Harney United (Student Focus) Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 3  Votes  305 73/84 (14.3%) Max Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.)     273    (12.8%)  1 Spencer Higgins (Student Focus)     238    (11.1%)  1 Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.)     239    (11.2%)  1 Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.)     203    (9.5%)  1 Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus)     180    (8.4%)  1 Avni Patel (L.E.A.D.)     187    (8.7%)  1 Katie Webber (Student Focus)     167    (7.8%)  1 Jenny Yu (L.E.A.D.)     164    (7.7%)  1 Behrad Brad Golshani (Student Focus)     138    (6.4%)  1 Brian McFadden (United Student Focus)     159    (7.4%)  1 Jimmy Moresco (Student Focus)     117    (5.5%)  1 Michael Kongo Aguilera (L.E.A.D.)     76    (3.5%)  1 None of these     5                Results       Michael Kongo Aguilera (L.E.A.D.) Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 4  Votes  304 49/84 (14.3%) Max Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.)     282    (13.2%)  1 Spencer Higgins (Student Focus)     244    (11.4%)  1 Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.)     250    (11.7%)  1 Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.)     212    (9.9%)  1 Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus)     187    (8.8%)  1 Avni Patel (L.E.A.D.)     192    (9.0%)  1 Katie Webber (Student Focus)     170    (8.0%)  1 Jenny Yu (L.E.A.D.)     168    (7.9%)  1 Behrad Brad Golshani (Student Focus)     140    (6.6%)  1 Brian McFadden (United Student Focus)     167    (7.8%)  1 Jimmy Moresco (Student Focus)     120    (5.6%)  1 None of these     14                Results       Jimmy Moresco (Student Focus) Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 5  Votes  301 61/84 (14.3%) Max Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.)     286    (13.5%)  1 Spencer Higgins (Student Focus)     260    (12.3%)  1 Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.)     255    (12.1%)  1 Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.)     219    (10.4%)  1 Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus)     220    (10.4%)  1 Avni Patel (L.E.A.D.)     198    (9.4%)  1 Katie Webber (Student Focus)     179    (8.5%)  1 Jenny Yu (L.E.A.D.)     170    (8.0%)  1 Behrad Brad Golshani (Student Focus)     148    (7.0%)  1 Brian McFadden (United Student Focus)     177    (8.4%)  1 None of these     34                Results       Behrad Brad Golshani (Student Focus) Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 6  Votes  299 37/84 (14.3%) Max Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.)     288    (13.7%)  1 Spencer Higgins (Student Focus)     307    (14.6%)  1 Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.)     263    (12.5%)  1 Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.)     221    (10.5%)  1 Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus)     241    (11.5%)  1 Avni Patel (L.E.A.D.)     227    (10.8%)  1 Katie Webber (Student Focus)     190    (9.1%)  1 Jenny Yu (L.E.A.D.)     175    (8.3%)  1 Brian McFadden (United Student Focus)     184    (8.8%)  1 None of these     50                Results       Spencer Higgins (Student Focus) Elected               Transfers (to these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Spencer Higgins (Student Focus) 7 47/84 82/84 1: 232

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 7  Votes  299 37/84 (14.3%) Max Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.)     288 26/84  (13.8%)  1 Spencer Higgins (Student Focus)     301 40/84  (14.4%)  82/84 Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.)     263 30/84  (12.6%)  1 Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.)     221 36/84  (10.6%)  1 Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus)     243 42/84  (11.6%)  1 Avni Patel (L.E.A.D.)     227 34/84  (10.8%)  1 Katie Webber (Student Focus)     191 14/84  (9.1%)  1 Jenny Yu (L.E.A.D.)     175 16/84  (8.4%)  1 Brian McFadden (United Student Focus)     184 14/84  (8.8%)  1 None of these     50                Results       Jenny Yu (L.E.A.D.) Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 8  Votes  293 1/84 (14.3%) Max Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.)     330 28/84  (16.1%)  1 Spencer Higgins (Student Focus)     308 30/84  (15.0%)  82/84 Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.)     281 32/84  (13.7%)  1 Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.)     229 36/84  (11.2%)  1 Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus)     269 56/84  (13.1%)  1 Avni Patel (L.E.A.D.)     248 38/84  (12.1%)  1 Katie Webber (Student Focus)     193 16/84  (9.4%)  1 Brian McFadden (United Student Focus)     190 16/84  (9.3%)  1 None of these     95                Results       Spencer Higgins (Student Focus) Equalized     Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.) Elected               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Spencer Higgins (Student Focus) 15 29/84 76/84 82/84: 237   Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.) 37 27/84 72/84 1: 261 2/84: 10

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 9  Votes  293 1/84 (14.3%) Max Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.)     294 4/84  (14.3%)  72/84 Spencer Higgins (Student Focus)     293 24/84  (14.3%)  76/84 Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.)     291 8/84  (14.2%)  1 Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.)     239 60/84  (11.7%)  1 Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus)     280 20/84  (13.7%)  1 Avni Patel (L.E.A.D.)     260 20/84  (12.7%)  1 Katie Webber (Student Focus)     197 64/84  (9.6%)  1 Brian McFadden (United Student Focus)     194 52/84  (9.5%)  1 None of these     95                Results       Brian McFadden (United Student Focus) Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 10  Votes  287 73/84 (14.3%) Max Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.)     328 28/84  (16.3%)  72/84 Spencer Higgins (Student Focus)     307 44/84  (15.3%)  76/84 Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.)     318 68/84  (15.8%)  1 Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.)     259 52/84  (12.9%)  1 Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus)     303 44/84  (15.1%)  1 Avni Patel (L.E.A.D.)     292 28/84  (14.5%)  1 Katie Webber (Student Focus)     204 72/84  (10.2%)  1 None of these     131                Results       Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus) Elected     Spencer Higgins (Student Focus) Equalized     Avni Patel (L.E.A.D.) Elected     Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.) Equalized     Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.) Elected               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus) 15 55/84 70/84 1: 246 12/84: 20 8/84: 91   Spencer Higgins (Student Focus) 19 55/84 65/84 76/84: 248 12/84: 13   Avni Patel (L.E.A.D.) 4 39/84 71/84 1: 235 12/84: 73 8/84: 17   Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.) 40 39/84 55/84 72/84: 289 8/84: 12   Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.) 30 79/84 65/84 1: 260 12/84: 68 8/84: 16

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 11  Votes  287 73/84 (14.3%) Max Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.)     295 61/84  (14.7%)  55/84 Spencer Higgins (Student Focus)     296 17/84  (14.7%)  65/84 Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.)     297 33/84  (14.8%)  65/84 Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.)     294 43/84  (14.6%)  1 Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus)     297 6/84  (14.7%)  70/84 Avni Patel (L.E.A.D.)     298 2/84  (14.8%)  71/84 Katie Webber (Student Focus)     236 6/84  (11.7%)  1 None of these     131                Results       Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.) Elected               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.) 6 54/84 1 1: 213 29/84: 63 19/84: 44 14/84: 20 13/84: 23

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

There is a newly elected candidate whose maximum could not be reduced. The surplus is lower than the number of ballots in the first histogram bin (the ballots counting the largest fraction toward the candidate) times the smallest fraction, so they cannot all transfer that fraction without exceeding the surplus.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 12  Votes  287 73/84 (14.3%) Max Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.)     295 61/84  (14.7%)  55/84 Spencer Higgins (Student Focus)     296 17/84  (14.7%)  65/84 Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.)     297 33/84  (14.8%)  65/84 Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.)     294 43/84  (14.6%)  1 Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus)     297 6/84  (14.7%)  70/84 Avni Patel (L.E.A.D.)     298 2/84  (14.8%)  71/84 Katie Webber (Student Focus)     236 6/84  (11.7%)  1 None of these     131                Results       Katie Webber (Student Focus) Defeated               Transfers (to these colors):

No elected candidates could reduce their maxima, so candidates were eliminated instead.
The last-place candidate is eliminated.
Go to the next round

First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 13  Votes  331 70/84 (16.7%) Max Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.)     305 5/84  (15.3%)  55/84 Spencer Higgins (Student Focus)     353 75/84  (17.8%)  65/84 Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.)     310 34/84  (15.6%)  65/84 Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.)     334 77/84  (16.8%)  1 Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus)     377 32/84  (19.0%)  70/84 Avni Patel (L.E.A.D.)     309 29/84  (15.5%)  71/84 None of these     155                Results       Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus) Equalized     Spencer Higgins (Student Focus) Equalized     Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.) Equalized     Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.) Equalized               Transfers (to these colors):     Transfers (from these colors):               Histograms  Surplus   New Max  Votes: Ballots   Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus) 45 46/84 40/84 70/84: 282 29/84: 23 19/84: 133 13/84: 26   Spencer Higgins (Student Focus) 22 5/84 42/84 65/84: 283 29/84: 14 19/84: 13 14/84: 83 13/84: 11   Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.) 3 7/84 74/84 1: 229 29/84: 66 19/84: 50 14/84: 33 13/84: 24   Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.)     63/84 65/84: 267 42/84: 31 40/84: 16 29/84: 70 13/84: 88 8/84: 56

The histogram shows how many ballots count a given fraction of a vote toward a winner. It is used to determine how much to lower the maximum. Ballots that cannot count for a lower-ranked candidate are not included in the histogram. The maximum is reduced in steps of the defined fractional precision, reducing the surplus by the number of ballots in the affected histogram bins divided by that precision. This process stops just before too many would be transferred. At this point, the affected bins are shown in red.
When only winners remain, they may reduce their maxima toward the Ideal Number.

Only winners remain, so the dotted line is raised to the Ideal Number.
Go to the next round

First Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Round 14  Votes  331 70/84 (16.7%) Max Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.)     326 56/84  (16.4%)  55/84 Spencer Higgins (Student Focus)     333 46/84  (16.8%)  42/84 Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.)     334 26/84  (16.8%)  63/84 Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.)     332 64/84  (16.7%)  74/84 Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus)     333 8/84  (16.7%)  40/84 Avni Patel (L.E.A.D.)     330 52/84  (16.6%)  71/84 None of these     155                Results         Natalia Farhadmotamed (Student Focus) Elected     Spencer Higgins (Student Focus) Elected     Avni Patel (L.E.A.D.) Elected     Christine Jacorie Rogers (L.E.A.D.) Elected     Kareem Salem (L.E.A.D.) Elected     Jonathan Tiny Sanders (L.E.A.D.) Elected

No further maximum reductions are allowed, so the count is complete. All winners should be near the Ideal Number of votes. Usually most ballots count toward their highest-ranked winner. Some count for two winners, but rarely more than that. See the slice report. The depth report shows the contribution of lower choices to the result. The "none of these" pile is an accurate measure of unsatisfied voters.

First Round | Final Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Rank	Fraction of votes for winners
1st	48.7%
2nd	25.2%
3rd	15.1%
4th	6.2%
5th	3.2%
6th	1.1%
7th	0.3%

First Round | Final Round | Depth | Slices | How it works | Main Page

Slices	Percentage of ballots with that many slices
1	19.9%
2	71.1%
3	9.0%