| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 1 |
|
|
 |
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
2,159.0 |
(13.5%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,701.0 |
(10.7%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,685.0 |
(10.6%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,435.0 |
(9.0%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,262.0 |
(7.9%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,122.0 |
(7.0%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,097.0 |
(6.9%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,038.0 |
(6.5%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,011.0 |
(6.3%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
835.0 |
(5.2%) |
|
| Seidel, Sam |
788.0 |
(4.9%) |
|
| Nelson, Matthew P. |
542.0 |
(3.4%) |
|
| Marquardt, Charles J. |
499.0 |
(3.1%) |
|
| Stohlman, Jr., Thomas J. |
344.0 |
(2.2%) |
|
| Williamson, James M. |
175.0 |
(1.1%) |
|
| Mello, Gary W. |
135.0 |
(0.8%) |
|
| Pascual, Jamake |
63.0 |
(0.4%) |
|
| Moree, Gregg J. |
56.0 |
(0.4%) |
|
| Write-In 1 |
15.0 |
(0.1%) |
|
| Write-In 2 |
9.0 |
(0.1%) |
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Cheung, Leland |
Elected |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
In the first round, the first choices on each ballot are tallied.
Cheung, Leland has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 2 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,597.1 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,701.0 |
(10.7%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,685.0 |
(10.6%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,549.1 |
(9.7%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,313.3 |
(8.2%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,191.5 |
(7.5%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,153.2 |
(7.2%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,108.1 |
(6.9%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,054.4 |
(6.6%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
857.2 |
(5.4%) |
|
| Seidel, Sam |
848.1 |
(5.3%) |
|
| Nelson, Matthew P. |
557.5 |
(3.5%) |
|
| Marquardt, Charles J. |
521.5 |
(3.3%) |
|
| Stohlman, Jr., Thomas J. |
365.3 |
(2.3%) |
|
| Williamson, James M. |
180.2 |
(1.1%) |
|
| Mello, Gary W. |
140.5 |
(0.9%) |
|
| Pascual, Jamake |
65.4 |
(0.4%) |
|
| Moree, Gregg J. |
58.1 |
(0.4%) |
|
| Write-In 1 |
15.6 |
(0.1%) |
|
| Write-In 2 |
9.0 |
(0.1%) |
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
Elected |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 3 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,597.1 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,597.1 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,685.0 |
(10.6%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,559.4 |
(9.8%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,329.9 |
(8.3%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,207.4 |
(7.6%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,163.0 |
(7.3%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,111.6 |
(7.0%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,067.6 |
(6.7%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
865.1 |
(5.4%) |
|
| Seidel, Sam |
852.0 |
(5.3%) |
|
| Nelson, Matthew P. |
562.7 |
(3.5%) |
|
| Marquardt, Charles J. |
531.2 |
(3.3%) |
|
| Stohlman, Jr., Thomas J. |
367.1 |
(2.3%) |
|
| Williamson, James M. |
181.4 |
(1.1%) |
|
| Mello, Gary W. |
142.4 |
(0.9%) |
|
| Pascual, Jamake |
65.8 |
(0.4%) |
|
| Moree, Gregg J. |
60.1 |
(0.4%) |
|
| Write-In 1 |
16.0 |
(0.1%) |
|
| Write-In 2 |
9.1 |
(0.1%) |
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Maher, David P. |
Elected |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
Maher, David P. has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 4 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,597.1 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,597.1 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,597.1 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,571.9 |
(9.8%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,339.7 |
(8.4%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,223.6 |
(7.7%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,172.5 |
(7.3%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,115.3 |
(7.0%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,076.3 |
(6.7%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
873.3 |
(5.5%) |
|
| Seidel, Sam |
859.4 |
(5.4%) |
|
| Nelson, Matthew P. |
564.8 |
(3.5%) |
|
| Marquardt, Charles J. |
534.8 |
(3.3%) |
|
| Stohlman, Jr., Thomas J. |
369.3 |
(2.3%) |
|
| Williamson, James M. |
182.3 |
(1.1%) |
|
| Mello, Gary W. |
143.4 |
(0.9%) |
|
| Pascual, Jamake |
66.4 |
(0.4%) |
|
| Moree, Gregg J. |
61.1 |
(0.4%) |
|
| Write-In 1 |
16.3 |
(0.1%) |
|
| Write-In 2 |
9.1 |
(0.1%) |
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Write-In 2 |
Defeated |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
The last-place candidate (Write-In 2) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
| New colors: |
|
None of these |
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 5 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,598.1 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,597.2 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,597.1 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,571.9 |
(9.8%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,339.7 |
(8.4%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,224.6 |
(7.7%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,173.5 |
(7.4%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,115.3 |
(7.0%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,076.3 |
(6.7%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
873.3 |
(5.5%) |
|
| Seidel, Sam |
859.4 |
(5.4%) |
|
| Nelson, Matthew P. |
564.8 |
(3.5%) |
|
| Marquardt, Charles J. |
534.8 |
(3.3%) |
|
| Stohlman, Jr., Thomas J. |
370.3 |
(2.3%) |
|
| Williamson, James M. |
182.3 |
(1.1%) |
|
| Mello, Gary W. |
143.4 |
(0.9%) |
|
| Pascual, Jamake |
66.4 |
(0.4%) |
|
| Moree, Gregg J. |
61.1 |
(0.4%) |
|
| Write-In 1 |
16.3 |
(0.1%) |
|
| None of these |
5.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Write-In 1 |
Defeated |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
The last-place candidate (Write-In 1) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 6 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,599.7 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,597.5 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,597.4 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,572.9 |
(9.9%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,339.7 |
(8.4%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,224.6 |
(7.7%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,173.5 |
(7.4%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,116.3 |
(7.0%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,077.3 |
(6.8%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
873.3 |
(5.5%) |
|
| Seidel, Sam |
859.4 |
(5.4%) |
|
| Nelson, Matthew P. |
565.8 |
(3.5%) |
|
| Marquardt, Charles J. |
535.8 |
(3.4%) |
|
| Stohlman, Jr., Thomas J. |
370.3 |
(2.3%) |
|
| Williamson, James M. |
183.3 |
(1.1%) |
|
| Mello, Gary W. |
143.5 |
(0.9%) |
|
| Pascual, Jamake |
66.4 |
(0.4%) |
|
| Moree, Gregg J. |
61.1 |
(0.4%) |
|
| None of these |
13.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Moree, Gregg J. |
Defeated |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
The last-place candidate (Moree, Gregg J.) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 7 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,600.7 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,600.4 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,599.7 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,575.2 |
(9.9%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,344.3 |
(8.4%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,226.9 |
(7.7%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,176.7 |
(7.4%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,121.0 |
(7.0%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,081.7 |
(6.8%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
874.5 |
(5.5%) |
|
| Seidel, Sam |
862.4 |
(5.4%) |
|
| Nelson, Matthew P. |
569.4 |
(3.6%) |
|
| Marquardt, Charles J. |
539.9 |
(3.4%) |
|
| Stohlman, Jr., Thomas J. |
373.3 |
(2.3%) |
|
| Williamson, James M. |
185.4 |
(1.2%) |
|
| Mello, Gary W. |
149.7 |
(0.9%) |
|
| Pascual, Jamake |
67.8 |
(0.4%) |
|
| None of these |
22.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Pascual, Jamake |
Defeated |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
The last-place candidate (Pascual, Jamake) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 8 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,603.6 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,600.6 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,599.8 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,577.5 |
(9.9%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,349.3 |
(8.5%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,229.2 |
(7.7%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,182.7 |
(7.4%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,123.1 |
(7.0%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,084.4 |
(6.8%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
879.5 |
(5.5%) |
|
| Seidel, Sam |
863.9 |
(5.4%) |
|
| Nelson, Matthew P. |
574.0 |
(3.6%) |
|
| Marquardt, Charles J. |
542.9 |
(3.4%) |
|
| Stohlman, Jr., Thomas J. |
382.4 |
(2.4%) |
|
| Williamson, James M. |
191.4 |
(1.2%) |
|
| Mello, Gary W. |
155.7 |
(1.0%) |
|
| None of these |
31.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Mello, Gary W. |
Defeated |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
The last-place candidate (Mello, Gary W.) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 9 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,607.6 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,604.2 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,602.2 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,583.9 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,356.4 |
(8.5%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,238.2 |
(7.8%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,191.2 |
(7.5%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,140.1 |
(7.2%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,095.7 |
(6.9%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
892.8 |
(5.6%) |
|
| Seidel, Sam |
866.9 |
(5.4%) |
|
| Nelson, Matthew P. |
584.2 |
(3.7%) |
|
| Marquardt, Charles J. |
559.3 |
(3.5%) |
|
| Stohlman, Jr., Thomas J. |
394.8 |
(2.5%) |
|
| Williamson, James M. |
198.5 |
(1.2%) |
|
| None of these |
55.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Williamson, James M. |
Defeated |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
The last-place candidate (Williamson, James M.) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 10 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,609.2 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,605.5 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,603.8 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,602.5 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,373.4 |
(8.6%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,249.7 |
(7.9%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,201.9 |
(7.6%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,169.1 |
(7.4%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,104.2 |
(6.9%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
920.6 |
(5.8%) |
|
| Seidel, Sam |
878.6 |
(5.5%) |
|
| Nelson, Matthew P. |
595.2 |
(3.7%) |
|
| Marquardt, Charles J. |
567.4 |
(3.6%) |
|
| Stohlman, Jr., Thomas J. |
414.9 |
(2.6%) |
|
| None of these |
75.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Davis, Henrietta |
Elected |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
Davis, Henrietta has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 11 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,609.2 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,605.5 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,603.8 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,589.6 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,375.9 |
(8.7%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,254.1 |
(7.9%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,201.9 |
(7.6%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,170.0 |
(7.4%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,105.0 |
(7.0%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
920.6 |
(5.8%) |
|
| Seidel, Sam |
881.1 |
(5.5%) |
|
| Nelson, Matthew P. |
596.9 |
(3.8%) |
|
| Marquardt, Charles J. |
567.7 |
(3.6%) |
|
| Stohlman, Jr., Thomas J. |
414.9 |
(2.6%) |
|
| None of these |
75.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Stohlman, Jr., Thomas J. |
Defeated |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
The last-place candidate (Stohlman, Jr., Thomas J.) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 12 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,623.1 |
(10.2%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,606.7 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,610.3 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,600.6 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,400.8 |
(8.8%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,294.6 |
(8.2%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,253.7 |
(7.9%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,265.3 |
(8.0%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,123.3 |
(7.1%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
946.6 |
(6.0%) |
|
| Seidel, Sam |
934.7 |
(5.9%) |
|
| Nelson, Matthew P. |
614.7 |
(3.9%) |
|
| Marquardt, Charles J. |
593.7 |
(3.7%) |
|
| None of these |
103.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Marquardt, Charles J. |
Defeated |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
The last-place candidate (Marquardt, Charles J.) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 13 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,642.4 |
(10.4%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,633.4 |
(10.3%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,630.9 |
(10.3%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,604.6 |
(10.2%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,424.0 |
(9.0%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,330.4 |
(8.4%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,392.6 |
(8.8%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,329.5 |
(8.4%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,147.5 |
(7.3%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
999.5 |
(6.3%) |
|
| Seidel, Sam |
972.2 |
(6.2%) |
|
| Nelson, Matthew P. |
683.0 |
(4.3%) |
|
| None of these |
181.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Nelson, Matthew P. |
Defeated |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
The last-place candidate (Nelson, Matthew P.) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 14 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,656.6 |
(10.5%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,660.2 |
(10.5%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,647.8 |
(10.5%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,622.4 |
(10.3%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,493.5 |
(9.5%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,408.4 |
(8.9%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,436.9 |
(9.1%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,426.3 |
(9.1%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,202.9 |
(7.6%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
1,123.1 |
(7.1%) |
|
| Seidel, Sam |
1,059.9 |
(6.7%) |
|
| None of these |
233.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Seidel, Sam |
Defeated |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
The last-place candidate (Seidel, Sam) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 15 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,715.3 |
(11.0%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,675.4 |
(10.7%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,679.4 |
(10.7%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,649.4 |
(10.5%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,665.0 |
(10.6%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,584.8 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,590.4 |
(10.2%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,581.7 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,300.0 |
(8.3%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
1,223.6 |
(7.8%) |
|
| None of these |
306.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Simmons, E. Denise |
Elected |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
Simmons, E. Denise has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 16 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,715.3 |
(11.0%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,675.4 |
(10.7%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,679.4 |
(10.7%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,649.4 |
(10.5%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,566.5 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,584.8 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,590.4 |
(10.2%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,581.7 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,365.0 |
(8.7%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
1,257.1 |
(8.0%) |
|
| None of these |
306.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Kelley, Craig A. |
Elected |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
Kelley, Craig A. has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 17 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,715.3 |
(11.0%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,675.4 |
(10.7%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,679.4 |
(10.7%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,649.4 |
(10.5%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,566.5 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,584.8 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,566.5 |
(10.0%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,581.7 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,376.2 |
(8.8%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
1,269.7 |
(8.1%) |
|
| None of these |
306.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
Elected |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
Decker, Marjorie C. has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 18 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,715.3 |
(11.0%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,675.4 |
(10.7%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,679.4 |
(10.7%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,649.4 |
(10.5%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,566.5 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,566.5 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,566.5 |
(10.0%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,581.7 |
(10.1%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,388.4 |
(8.9%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
1,275.9 |
(8.1%) |
|
| None of these |
306.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
Elected |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 19 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,715.3 |
(11.0%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,675.4 |
(10.7%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,679.4 |
(10.7%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,649.4 |
(10.5%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,566.5 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,566.5 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,566.5 |
(10.0%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,566.5 |
(10.0%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,395.2 |
(8.9%) |
|
| Ward, Larry W. |
1,284.3 |
(8.2%) |
|
| None of these |
306.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Ward, Larry W. |
Defeated |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
The last-place candidate (Ward, Larry W.) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 20 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,880.1 |
(12.1%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,734.6 |
(11.2%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,746.0 |
(11.3%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,753.5 |
(11.3%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,649.8 |
(10.6%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,617.9 |
(10.4%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,614.6 |
(10.4%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,666.7 |
(10.7%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,849.9 |
(11.9%) |
|
| None of these |
458.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Cheung, Leland |
Elected |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
Cheung, Leland has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 21 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,734.6 |
(11.2%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,746.0 |
(11.3%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,753.5 |
(11.3%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,686.1 |
(10.9%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,666.2 |
(10.7%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,645.5 |
(10.6%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,707.6 |
(11.0%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,849.9 |
(11.9%) |
|
| None of these |
458.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
Elected |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
Reeves, Kenneth E. has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 22 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,734.6 |
(11.2%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,746.0 |
(11.3%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,753.5 |
(11.3%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,748.5 |
(11.3%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,698.3 |
(10.9%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,656.6 |
(10.7%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,728.2 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| None of these |
458.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Davis, Henrietta |
Elected |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
Davis, Henrietta has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 23 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,734.6 |
(11.2%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,746.0 |
(11.3%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,748.5 |
(11.3%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,716.8 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,667.9 |
(10.8%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,728.2 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| None of these |
458.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Simmons, E. Denise |
Elected |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
Simmons, E. Denise has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 24 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,734.6 |
(11.2%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,746.0 |
(11.3%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,735.2 |
(11.2%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,674.3 |
(10.8%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,728.2 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| None of these |
458.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Maher, David P. |
Elected |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
Maher, David P. has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 25 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,734.6 |
(11.2%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,735.2 |
(11.2%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,696.7 |
(10.9%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,728.2 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| None of these |
458.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
Elected |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
Decker, Marjorie C. has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 26 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,734.6 |
(11.2%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,708.2 |
(11.0%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,728.2 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| None of these |
458.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
Elected |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 27 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,719.1 |
(11.1%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,728.2 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| None of these |
458.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
Redistributed Votes (to these colors) |
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
Elected |
|
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (10% of counted votes).
vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
Next Round
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form: First Round |
Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
| Round 28 |
|
|
|
11.1% |
|
| Cheung, Leland |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Maher, David P. |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Davis, Henrietta |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Simmons, E. Denise |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Decker, Marjorie C. |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Kelley, Craig A. |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| Reeves, Kenneth E. |
1,723.7 |
(11.1%) |
|
| None of these |
458.0 |
|
|
| | | |
|
| Results |
|
| Cheung, Leland | Elected | |
| Davis, Henrietta | Elected | |
| Decker, Marjorie C. | Elected | |
| Kelley, Craig A. | Elected | |
| Maher, David P. | Elected | |
| Reeves, Kenneth E. | Elected | |
| Simmons, E. Denise | Elected | |
| Toomey, Jr., Timothy J. | Elected | |
| vanBeuzekom, Minka Y. | Elected | |
Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the
How it works page, view the
table form,
or ask a question.
The dotted line represents
the number of votes that guarantees victory (11.1% of counted votes).
At this point, the number of remaining candidates equals the number of remaining seats,
so the remaining candidates are declared elected.
In the end, 97.1% of all cast ballots counted toward a winner. This compares to 78.3%
if only the first-round votes were used.
You should be able to see that the winners have a more equal mandate in the final round than in
the first round.
Note that even the "highest first-round votes" method is more democratic than most
methods used in US public elections: the "vote for 9" method, which
allows the largest block of voters to dominate, and the district method, where choices are restricted
to the one or two viable candidates within geographical boundaries drawn by the politicians in office.
The
Ballot Depth section shows how much lower rankings contributed to the tally.
| DemoChoice Web Poll: Cambridge, MA 2011 City Council Election |
| 9 candidates will be elected with 15,971 ballots cast. |
Table form |
Chart form:
First Round |
Final Round |
Ballot Depth |
How it works |
Main Page
Ballot Depth: This shows how much the lower rankings on ballots contributed to the winning
candidates.
| Rank |
Fraction of votes for winners |
| 1st | 75.3% |
|
| 2nd | 12.7% |
|
| 3rd | 6.0% |
|
| 4th | 2.6% |
|
| 5th | 1.2% |
|
| 6th | 0.8% |
|
| 7th | 0.5% |
|
| 8th | 0.3% |
|
| 9th | 0.2% |
|
| 10th | 0.1% |
|
| 11th | 0.0% |
|
| 12th | 0.1% |
|
| 13th | 0.1% |
|
