Candidate | Votes | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Peter Wing Ho CHIN | 19,862 | (43.4%) | ||
Malcolm Saba FARRY | 17,674 | (38.7%) | ||
Leah MCBEY | 3,688 | (8.1%) | ||
Teresa STEVENSON | 2,893 | (6.3%) | ||
Lee VANDERVIS | 1,414 | (3.1%) | ||
Jimmy KNOWLES | 189 | (0.4%) | Defeated |
In the first round, the first choices on each ballot are tallied.
The last-place candidate (Jimmy KNOWLES) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
Go to the next round.
Candidate | Votes | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Peter Wing Ho CHIN | 19,886 | (43.5%) | ||
Malcolm Saba FARRY | 17,692 | (38.7%) | ||
Leah MCBEY | 3,728 | (8.2%) | ||
Teresa STEVENSON | 2,926 | (6.4%) | ||
Lee VANDERVIS | 1,441 | (3.2%) | Defeated |
The last-place candidate (Lee VANDERVIS) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
Go to the next round.
Candidate | Votes | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Peter Wing Ho CHIN | 20,248 | (44.6%) | ||
Malcolm Saba FARRY | 17,909 | (39.4%) | ||
Leah MCBEY | 3,935 | (8.7%) | ||
Teresa STEVENSON | 3,305 | (7.3%) | Defeated |
The last-place candidate (Teresa STEVENSON) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
Go to the next round.
Candidate | Votes | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Peter Wing Ho CHIN | 21,046 | (47.1%) | ||
Malcolm Saba FARRY | 18,488 | (41.4%) | ||
Leah MCBEY | 5,135 | (11.5%) | Defeated |
The last-place candidate (Leah MCBEY) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
Go to the next round.
Candidate | Votes | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Peter Wing Ho CHIN | 23,017 | (53.5%) | Elected | |
Malcolm Saba FARRY | 20,029 | (46.5%) | Defeated |
Peter Wing Ho CHIN has enough votes to guarantee victory (50%) and is declared a winner.
In the end, 50.3% of all cast ballots counted toward a winner. This compares to 43.4% if only the first-round votes were used.
Also, view the Ballot Depth info to see how much lower rankings contributed to the tally.
This shows how much the lower rankings on ballots contributed to the winning candidate.
Rank | Fraction of votes for winner | ||
---|---|---|---|
1st | 86.3% | ||
2nd | 8.7% | ||
3rd | 3.3% | ||
4th | 1.2% | ||
5th | 0.5% |