DemoChoice Web Poll: ASUC 2003 Executive VP Election (UC Berkeley)
1 candidate will be elected with 7,359 ballots cast.
Round 1
| Candidate | Votes | Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taina Gomez, CalSERVE |
|
3,211 | (43.6%) | |
| FRANK LEE, STUDENT ACTION/BECS ENGINEERS/UNITE GREEK |
|
2,635 | (35.8%) | |
| PAUL 'Fair & Balanced' LAFATA (Senator), APPLE |
|
948 | (12.9%) | |
| Kevin 'Kick 'em Out' Deenihan, Squelch! |
|
565 | (7.7%) | Defeated |
In the first round, the first choices on each ballot are tallied.
The last-place candidate (Kevin 'Kick 'em Out' Deenihan, Squelch!) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
Go to the next round.
DemoChoice Web Poll: ASUC 2003 Executive VP Election (UC Berkeley)
1 candidate will be elected with 7,359 ballots cast.
Round 2
| Candidate | Votes | Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taina Gomez, CalSERVE |
|
3,316 | (46.8%) | |
| FRANK LEE, STUDENT ACTION/BECS ENGINEERS/UNITE GREEK |
|
2,714 | (38.3%) | |
| PAUL 'Fair & Balanced' LAFATA (Senator), APPLE |
|
1,052 | (14.9%) | Defeated |
The last-place candidate (PAUL 'Fair & Balanced' LAFATA (Senator), APPLE) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
Go to the next round.
DemoChoice Web Poll: ASUC 2003 Executive VP Election (UC Berkeley)
1 candidate will be elected with 7,359 ballots cast.
Round 3
| Candidate | Votes | Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taina Gomez, CalSERVE |
|
3,564 | (53.8%) | Elected |
| FRANK LEE, STUDENT ACTION/BECS ENGINEERS/UNITE GREEK |
|
3,063 | (46.2%) | Defeated |
Taina Gomez, CalSERVE has enough votes to guarantee victory (50%) and is declared a winner.
In the end, 48.4% of all cast ballots counted toward a winner. This compares to 43.6% if only the first-round votes were used.
Also, view the Ballot Depth info to see how much lower rankings contributed to the tally.
DemoChoice Web Poll: ASUC 2003 Executive VP Election (UC Berkeley)
1 candidate will be elected with 7,359 ballots cast.
Ballot Depth
This shows how much the lower rankings on ballots contributed to the winning candidate.
| Rank | Fraction of votes for winner | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st |
|
90.1% | |
| 2nd |
|
7.6% | |
| 3rd |
|
2.3% | |