Candidate | Votes | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ciara Barclay |
![]() |
1.0 | (50.0%) | Elected | |
Laura-Ioana Tifer |
![]() |
1.0 | (50.0%) |
In the first round, the first choices on each ballot are tallied.
Ciara Barclay has enough votes to guarantee victory
(11.1%) and is declared a winner.To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking (this is actually done by counting a fraction of ballots cast for the winning candidate).
Go to the next round.
Candidate | Votes | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ciara Barclay |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | ||
Laura-Ioana Tifer |
![]() |
1.0 | (50.0%) | Elected | |
Layla Al-shankiti |
![]() |
0.8 | (37.5%) |
Laura-Ioana Tifer has enough votes to guarantee victory (11.1%) and is declared a winner.To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking (this is actually done by counting a fraction of ballots cast for the winning candidate).
Go to the next round.
Candidate | Votes | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ciara Barclay |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | ||
Laura-Ioana Tifer |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | ||
Abia Afzal |
![]() |
0.8 | (37.5%) | ||
Layla Al-shankiti |
![]() |
0.8 | (37.5%) | Elected |
Layla Al-shankiti has enough votes to guarantee victory (11.1%) and is declared a winner.To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking (this is actually done by counting a fraction of ballots cast for the winning candidate).
Go to the next round.
Candidate | Votes | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ciara Barclay |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | ||
Laura-Ioana Tifer |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | ||
Abia Afzal |
![]() |
0.8 | (37.5%) | Elected | |
Layla Al-shankiti |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | ||
Amber-Mae Xiang Ling Loh |
![]() |
0.5 | (25.0%) |
Abia Afzal has enough votes to guarantee victory (11.1%) and is declared a winner.To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking (this is actually done by counting a fraction of ballots cast for the winning candidate).
Go to the next round.
Candidate | Votes | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ciara Barclay |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | ||
Laura-Ioana Tifer |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | ||
Abia Afzal |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | ||
(Kelly) Chu Ka Yee |
![]() |
0.5 | (25.0%) | ||
Layla Al-shankiti |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | ||
Amber-Mae Xiang Ling Loh |
![]() |
0.5 | (25.0%) | Elected |
Amber-Mae Xiang Ling Loh has enough votes to guarantee victory (11.1%) and is declared a winner.To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking (this is actually done by counting a fraction of ballots cast for the winning candidate).
Go to the next round.
Candidate | Votes | Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ciara Barclay |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | ||
Laura-Ioana Tifer |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | ||
Abia Afzal |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | ||
(Kelly) Chu Ka Yee |
![]() |
0.5 | (25.0%) | Elected | |
Layla Al-shankiti |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | ||
Amber-Mae Xiang Ling Loh |
![]() |
0.5 | (25.0%) |
(Kelly) Chu Ka Yee has enough votes to guarantee victory (11.1%) and is declared a winner.To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking (this is actually done by counting a fraction of ballots cast for the winning candidate).
Go to the next round.
Candidate | Votes | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Ciara Barclay |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | Elected |
Laura-Ioana Tifer |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | Elected |
Abia Afzal |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | Elected |
Annie Zheng |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | Elected |
(Kelly) Chu Ka Yee |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | Elected |
Layla Al-shankiti |
![]() |
0.3 | (12.5%) | Elected |
Amber-Mae Xiang Ling Loh |
![]() |
0.5 | (25.0%) | Elected |
At this point, the number of remaining candidates equals the number of remaining seats, so the remaining candidates are declared elected.
In the end, 100% of all cast ballots counted toward a winner. This compares to 100% if only the first-round votes were used. You should be able to see that the winners have a more equal mandate in the final round than in the first round.
Note that even the "highest first-round votes" method is more democratic than most methods used in US public elections: the "vote for 8" method, which allows the largest block of voters to dominate, and the district method, where choices are restricted to the one or two viable candidates within geographical boundaries drawn by the politicians in office.
Also, view the Ballot Depth info to see how much lower rankings contributed to the tally.
This shows how much the lower rankings on ballots contributed to the winning candidates.
Rank | Fraction of votes for winners | ||
---|---|---|---|
1st |
![]() |
12.5% | |
2nd |
![]() |
25.0% | |
3rd |
![]() |
25.0% | |
4th |
![]() |
12.5% | |
5th |
![]() |
12.5% | |
6th |
![]() |
12.5% |