DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew by DemoChoice rules |
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast. |
Table form | Chart form: First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page
Round 1 |
|
||||||||
Peter Wing Ho CHIN | 6,568.0 | (62.0%) |
|
||||||
Richard WALLS | 1,677.0 | (15.8%) |
|
||||||
Lee VANDERVIS | 965.0 | (9.1%) |
|
||||||
Fliss BUTCHER | 766.0 | (7.2%) |
|
||||||
Phillip DE WATTIGNAR | 278.0 | (2.6%) |
|
||||||
Diane YELDON | 179.0 | (1.7%) |
|
||||||
Mark PETERS | 161.0 | (1.5%) |
|
||||||
Results | Redistributed Votes (to these colors) | ||||||||
Peter Wing Ho CHIN | Elected |
|
In the first round, the first choices on each ballot are tallied.
Peter Wing Ho CHIN has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew by DemoChoice rules |
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast. |
Table form | Chart form: First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page
Round 2 |
|
|||||||
Peter Wing Ho CHIN | 2,648.5 | (25.0%) |
|
|||||
Richard WALLS | 3,407.7 | (32.2%) |
|
|||||
Lee VANDERVIS | 1,799.7 | (17.0%) |
|
|||||
Fliss BUTCHER | 1,393.2 | (13.2%) |
|
|||||
Phillip DE WATTIGNAR | 644.5 | (6.1%) |
|
|||||
Diane YELDON | 322.5 | (3.0%) |
|
|||||
Mark PETERS | 377.9 | (3.6%) |
|
|||||
Results | Redistributed Votes (to these colors) | |||||||
Richard WALLS | Elected |
|
Richard WALLS has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew by DemoChoice rules |
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast. |
Table form | Chart form: First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page
Round 3 |
|
|||||||||
Peter Wing Ho CHIN | 2,648.5 | (25.0%) |
|
|||||||
Richard WALLS | 2,648.5 | (25.0%) |
|
|||||||
Lee VANDERVIS | 2,051.6 | (19.4%) |
|
|||||||
Fliss BUTCHER | 1,610.2 | (15.2%) |
|
|||||||
Phillip DE WATTIGNAR | 767.1 | (7.2%) |
|
|||||||
Diane YELDON | 388.3 | (3.7%) |
|
|||||||
Mark PETERS | 479.9 | (4.5%) |
|
|||||||
Results | Redistributed Votes (to these colors) | |||||||||
Diane YELDON | Defeated |
|
The last-place candidate (Diane YELDON) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
New colors: |
|
None of these |
DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew by DemoChoice rules |
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast. |
Table form | Chart form: First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page
Round 4 |
|
||||||||
Peter Wing Ho CHIN | 2,744.4 | (25.9%) |
|
||||||
Richard WALLS | 2,651.5 | (25.1%) |
|
||||||
Lee VANDERVIS | 2,133.3 | (20.2%) |
|
||||||
Fliss BUTCHER | 1,717.2 | (16.2%) |
|
||||||
Phillip DE WATTIGNAR | 809.7 | (7.7%) |
|
||||||
Mark PETERS | 525.9 | (5.0%) |
|
||||||
None of these | 12.0 |
|
|||||||
Results | Redistributed Votes (to these colors) | ||||||||
Mark PETERS | Defeated |
|
The last-place candidate (Mark PETERS) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew by DemoChoice rules |
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast. |
Table form | Chart form: First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page
Round 5 |
|
|||||||
Peter Wing Ho CHIN | 2,958.3 | (28.0%) |
|
|||||
Richard WALLS | 2,665.5 | (25.2%) |
|
|||||
Lee VANDERVIS | 2,224.2 | (21.1%) |
|
|||||
Fliss BUTCHER | 1,821.2 | (17.2%) |
|
|||||
Phillip DE WATTIGNAR | 895.8 | (8.5%) |
|
|||||
None of these | 29.0 |
|
||||||
Results | Redistributed Votes (to these colors) | |||||||
Phillip DE WATTIGNAR | Defeated |
|
The last-place candidate (Phillip DE WATTIGNAR) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew by DemoChoice rules |
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast. |
Table form | Chart form: First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page
Round 6 |
|
||||||
Peter Wing Ho CHIN | 3,301.4 | (31.4%) |
|
||||
Richard WALLS | 2,700.5 | (25.6%) |
|
||||
Lee VANDERVIS | 2,446.1 | (23.2%) |
|
||||
Fliss BUTCHER | 2,082.1 | (19.8%) |
|
||||
None of these | 64.0 |
|
|||||
Results | Redistributed Votes (to these colors) | ||||||
Fliss BUTCHER | Defeated |
|
The last-place candidate (Fliss BUTCHER) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.
DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew by DemoChoice rules |
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast. |
Table form | Chart form: First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page
Round 7 |
|
||||||
Peter Wing Ho CHIN | 4,272.5 | (41.3%) |
|
||||
Richard WALLS | 2,807.5 | (27.2%) |
|
||||
Lee VANDERVIS | 3,255.0 | (31.5%) |
|
||||
None of these | 259.0 |
|
|||||
Results | Redistributed Votes (to these colors) | ||||||
Peter Wing Ho CHIN | Elected |
|
Peter Wing Ho CHIN has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew by DemoChoice rules |
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast. |
Table form | Chart form: First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page
Round 8 |
|
||||||
Peter Wing Ho CHIN | 3,445.0 | (33.3%) |
|
||||
Richard WALLS | 3,429.9 | (33.2%) |
|
||||
Lee VANDERVIS | 3,460.1 | (33.5%) |
|
||||
None of these | 259.0 |
|
|||||
Results | Redistributed Votes (to these colors) | ||||||
Lee VANDERVIS | Elected |
|
Lee VANDERVIS has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner. To ensure that everyone's vote counts equally, votes that exceed that threshold are counted toward their next highest ranking, if possible. This is actually done by counting a fraction of the ballots most recently counted for the winning candidate.
DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew by DemoChoice rules |
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast. |
Table form | Chart form: First Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page
Round 9 |
|
||||||
Peter Wing Ho CHIN | 3,445.0 | (33.3%) |
|
||||
Richard WALLS | 3,445.0 | (33.3%) |
|
||||
Lee VANDERVIS | 3,445.0 | (33.3%) |
|
||||
None of these | 259.0 |
|
|||||
Results | |||||||
Peter Wing Ho CHIN | Elected | ||||||
Lee VANDERVIS | Elected | ||||||
Richard WALLS | Elected |
At this point, the number of remaining candidates equals the number of remaining seats,
so the remaining candidates are declared elected.
In the end, 97.6% of all cast ballots counted toward a winner. This compares to 86.9%
if only the first-round votes were used.
You should be able to see that the winners have a more equal mandate in the final round than in
the first round.
Note that even the "highest first-round votes" method is more democratic than most methods used in US public elections: the "vote for 3" method, which allows the largest block of voters to dominate, and the district method, where choices are restricted to the one or two viable candidates within geographical boundaries drawn by the politicians in office.
The Ballot Depth section shows how much lower rankings contributed to the tally.
DemoChoice Web Poll: New Zealand, Dunedin City, Hills Ward, 2004 note: Chin withdrew by DemoChoice rules |
3 candidates will be elected with 10,594 ballots cast. |
Table form | Chart form: First Round | Final Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page
Rank | Fraction of votes for winners | ||
1st | 55.9% | ||
2nd | 28.7% | ||
3rd | 10.4% | ||
4th | 2.1% |