DemoChoice Web Poll: ASUC 2003 Executive VP Election (UC Berkeley)
1 candidate will be elected with 7,359 ballots cast.

Table form | Chart form: First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page


Round 1    
------------------------------------------------------- 50%
Taina Gomez, CalSERVE  3,211  (43.6%) 
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE _______ :
FRANK LEE, STUDENT ACTION/BECS ENGINEERS/UNITE GREEK  2,635  (35.8%) 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB ________________ :
PAUL 'Fair & Balanced' LAFATA (Senator), APPLE  948  (12.9%) 
DDDDDDDDDDDDDD _________________________________________ :
Kevin 'Kick 'em Out' Deenihan, Squelch!  565  (7.7%) 
CCCCCCCCC ______________________________________________ :
   
Results   Redistributed Votes (to these colors)
Kevin 'Kick 'em Out' Deenihan, Squelch! Defeated
B D EE FFFF

Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the How it works page, view the table form, or ask a question.
The dotted line represents the number of votes that guarantees victory (50% of counted votes).

In the first round, the first choices on each ballot are tallied.
The last-place candidate (Kevin 'Kick 'em Out' Deenihan, Squelch!) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.

New colors:
F
None of these

next round Next Round














 
 
DemoChoice Web Poll: ASUC 2003 Executive VP Election (UC Berkeley)
1 candidate will be elected with 7,359 ballots cast.

Table form | Chart form: First Round | Next Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page


Round 2    
---------------------------------------------------- 50%
Taina Gomez, CalSERVE  3,316  (46.8%) 
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE ___ :
FRANK LEE, STUDENT ACTION/BECS ENGINEERS/UNITE GREEK  2,714  (38.3%) 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB ____________ :
PAUL 'Fair & Balanced' LAFATA (Senator), APPLE  1,052  (14.9%) 
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD _____________________________________ :
None of these  277   
FFFFF _______________________________________________
   
Results   Redistributed Votes (to these colors)
PAUL 'Fair & Balanced' LAFATA (Senator), APPLE Defeated
BBBBB EEE FFFFFF

Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the How it works page, view the table form, or ask a question.
The dotted line represents the number of votes that guarantees victory (50% of counted votes).

The last-place candidate (PAUL 'Fair & Balanced' LAFATA (Senator), APPLE) is eliminated. Ballots for that candidate are counted toward their next highest ranking.

next round Next Round














 
  
DemoChoice Web Poll: ASUC 2003 Executive VP Election (UC Berkeley)
1 candidate will be elected with 7,359 ballots cast.

Table form | Chart form: First Round | Final Round | Previous Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page


Round 3    
------------------------------------------------- 50%
Taina Gomez, CalSERVE  3,564  (53.8%) 
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE :EEEEE
FRANK LEE, STUDENT ACTION/BECS ENGINEERS/UNITE GREEK  3,063  (46.2%) 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB ___ :
None of these  732   
FFFFFFFFFFF ______________________________________
   
Results  
FRANK LEE, STUDENT ACTION/BECS ENGINEERS/UNITE GREEKDefeated 
Taina Gomez, CalSERVEElected 

Note: If this doesn't make sense, try reading the How it works page, view the table form, or ask a question.
The dotted line represents the number of votes that guarantees victory (50% of counted votes).

Taina Gomez, CalSERVE has enough votes to guarantee victory and is declared a winner.
In the end, 48.4% of all cast ballots counted toward a winner. This compares to 43.6% if only the first-round votes were used.

The Ballot Depth section shows how much lower rankings contributed to the tally.
















 
 
DemoChoice Web Poll: ASUC 2003 Executive VP Election (UC Berkeley)
1 candidate will be elected with 7,359 ballots cast.

Table form | Chart form: First Round | Final Round | Ballot Depth | How it works | Main Page


Ballot Depth: This shows how much the lower rankings on ballots contributed to the winning candidate.

Rank Fraction of votes for winner
1st 90.1% 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
2nd 7.6% 
XXXX
3rd 2.3% 
X